Melissa

MelissaWeekly.news — Neighborhood news for a growing North Texas hometown.

Back to Texas

Corpus Christi voters to decide whether industry keeps its drought-fine exemption after a stalled desalination plant

A planned seawater plant grew from $140 million to $1.2 billion before the council fired its builder. A petition drive put a measure on the November ballot to end the fee deal that shields big water users from drought surcharges.

Dexter Lindgren

October 12, 20262 min read

Corpus Christi voters will decide in November whether to end a 2018 arrangement that lets the city's largest industrial water users skip drought fines, after a seawater desalination plant meant to make the region "drought proof" ballooned in cost and never got built.

A review of public records by Inside Climate News and The Texas Newsroom, published Monday by The Texas Tribune, traces how the plan took shape and why it came apart.

How the deal worked

In 2018, the City Council unanimously agreed that big water users, including refineries and chemical plants, could avoid drought surcharges if they paid an immediate water-rate increase of about 8%. That fee was meant to repay state loans for a desalination plant.

At first, city staff priced a 10-million-gallon-a-day plant at $140 million. By 2020 the plan had doubled to 20 million gallons and about $220 million, and staff said the industry fee would cover only two-thirds of the loan payments.

By early 2024 officials wanted a plant three times the original size, estimated at $757 million, with about $68 million a year in debt payments against roughly $6 million a year from the fee. In July 2025, the builder put the price at $1.2 billion.

That September, after a 13-hour meeting, the council fired the contractor. The city has spent at least $50 million on the project, according to the report, and staff have warned it would have to repay $235 million in state loans plus about $70 million in interest if the project is abandoned.

Drought and a petition

As reservoirs fell below 20%, the city banned most lawn watering and car washing but never imposed surcharges. By this spring, the main reservoirs had nearly run dry and industrial users drilled emergency wells. Heavy July rain on the upper Nueces River pushed levels back above 40%.

Isabel Araiza, a college professor who founded the group For the Greater Good, and other activists collected nearly 13,000 signatures for the Fair Water Amendment, which would repeal the exemption fee and raise what large users pay during the next drought. "The reason we were in the water crisis was because of their water usage," Araiza said.

Bob Paulison, who leads the trade group representing the industrial users, said the companies are not to blame and that city leaders failed to deliver the project the companies helped fund. Joe McComb, mayor when the 2018 plan passed, said the city needs industry and that the activists want to punish it.

Gov. Greg Abbott said in March that city leaders "squandered" state loans for the plant.

In September, the council rejected a proposal from a different contractor to build the plant at a somewhat lower cost. Every council seat is on the November ballot, and supporters of desalination hope a new council will revive it.

Sources

The Texas Tribune

Share

Dexter Lindgren

Dexter Lindgren covers Melissa city hall, the council, and county government.

Related Stories

More in Sport